01824nas a2200205   4500008004100000245012200041210006900163300001200232490000800244520115400252653002701406653003001433653001201463653001901475653002701494653001501521100002401536700001701560856004101577       1998                        eng d00aRepresentation of behaviorally relevant sound frequencies by auditory receptors in the cricket teleogryllus oceanicus0 aRepresentation of behaviorally relevant sound frequencies by aud  a155-1630 v2013 a<p>Teleogryllus oceanicus is particularly sensitive to two ranges of sound frequency, one corresponding to intraspecific acoustical signals (4-5 kHz) and the other to the echolocation cries of bats (25-50 kHz). We recorded summed responses of the auditory nerve to stimuli in these two ranges. Nerve responses consist of trains of compound action potentials (CAPs), each produced by the summed activity of a number of receptor neurons. The amplitude of the CAP is up to four times larger for stimuli at 4.5 kHz than for stimuli at 30 kHz, suggesting either that the extracellular spikes produced by receptors that respond to 4.5 kHz are larger than those that respond to 30 kHz, or that receptors fire more synchronously in response to stimulation at 4.5 kHz, or that more receptors respond to stimulation at 4.5 kHz. Neither unit spike amplitude nor conduction velocity (which is expected to vary with spike amplitude) differs for the two frequencies, and the responses to 4.5 kHz are not produced by more tightly synchronized receptor populations, as judged by CAP breadth. We conclude that more receptors respond to 4. 5 kHz than to 30 kHz.</p>
10aacoustic communication10acompound action potential10acricket10asensory coding10aTeleogryllus oceanicus10aultrasound1 aPollack, Gerald, S.1 aFaulkes, Zen  uhttps://bio.acousti.ca/de/node/5761802511nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001300041245012200054210006900176260001600245300001200261490000800273520169800281653002701979653001502006653002202021653002102043653002702064653002102091653001502112653001702127100002302144700002402167856006602191       2017                        eng d  a0003347200aDivergent mechanisms of acoustic mate recognition between closely related field cricket species ( Teleogryllus  spp.)0 aDivergent mechanisms of acoustic mate recognition between closel  cJan-08-2017  a17 - 250 v1303 a<p>Effective recognition of conspeci fi c mating signals reduces the risk of maladaptive hybridization. Dis- secting the signal recognition algorithms that underlie preferences is a useful approach for testing whether closely related taxa evaluate the same or different signal features to achieve mate recognition. Such data provide information about potential constraints and targets of selection during evolutionary divergence. Using a series of mate choice trials, we tested whether closely related, but genetically and phenotypically divergent, fi eld cricket species ( Teleogryllus oceanicus and Teleogryllus commodus ) use shared or distinct recognition algorithms when evaluating acoustic male calling songs. These species overlap in sympatry, show premating isolation based on female discrimination of male calling songs, yet are capable of producing hybrid offspring. Unexpectedly, female selectivity for features of male song differed between the two species. We found that the two species use a combination of shared and unique signal fi ltering mechanisms, and we characterized how information about male carrier frequency, pulse rate and temporal patterning is integrated to achieve song recognition in each species. These results illustrate how comparatively few, simple modi fi cations in key components of signal recognition algo- rithms can lead to striking interspeci fi c discrimination between closely related taxa, despite apparent signal complexity. The fi nding that some steps during signal recognition and fi ltering are shared between the species, while others differ, can help to identify behavioural traits targeted by selection during evolutionary divergence</p>
10aacoustic communication10adivergence10afemale preference10amate recognition10areproductive isolation10asexual selection10aspeciation10aTeleogryllus1 aBailey, Nathan, W.1 aHennig, R. Matthias  uhttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347217301823