02287nas a2200289 4500008004100000022001300041245011100054210006900165260001600234300001400250490000800264520141900272653001701691653001801708653002501726653001401751653001501765653001501780653001501795653001601810653001901826100002601845700002801871700001901899700002601918856005301944 2006 eng d a1210575900aBioacoustics and systematics of the Poecilimon heroicus-group (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae: Barbitistinae)0 aBioacoustics and systematics of the Poecilimon heroicusgroup Ort cFeb-10-2006 a853 - 8650 v1033 a

The species of the Poecilimon heroicus-group occur around the Caucasus (from north-eastern Turkey to south-eastern Ukraine). We describe the diagnostic morphological characters of all these species and the male calling song of three of the four spe- cies. Based on this data the following phylogenetic relationship is derived (P. tschorochensis (P. tricuspis (P. heroicus, P. bifenes- tratus))). Within the genus Poecilimon, the species can be recognised by a relatively wide pronotum and large tegmina. In one species, Poecilimon tschorochensis Adelung, 1907 (type species of the monotypic genus Artvinia Karabag, 1962, syn. n.; P. rammei Miram, 1938, syn. n.), the tegmina are very large and the song has unusually low spectral components. This species produced di- syllabic echemes at intervals of about 10 s. In two other species of the group, P. heroicus and P. bifenestratus, the calling song of males consists of an uninterrupted dense sequence of long syllables (syllable duration around 0.5 s; ca. 1 syllable/s at 20°C). In these species the auditory spiracles are reduced in size in both sexes, and the females have extremely small tegmina and are unable to respond to the male song acoustically, which would be typical for Phaneropteridae. The change in communication from acoustically responding to mute females has not been previously documented within a group of closely related species.

10abioacoustics10aBush-crickets10acommunication system10aevolution10amorphology10aOrthoptera10aPoecilimon10asystematics10aTettigonioidea1 aHELLER, KLAUS-GERHARD1 aKORSUNOVSKAYA, Olga, S.1 aSevgili, Hasan1 aZHANTIEV, Roustem, D. uhttp://www.eje.cz/doi/10.14411/eje.2006.116.html02122nas a2200253 4500008004100000245021600041210006900257520120800326653001301534653001701547653001801564653001701582653001401599653001301613653000901626653002401635100002901659700002001688700002701708700001901735700002101754700003601775856005701811 2013 eng d00aReview of the Balkan Isophya (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae) with particular emphasis on the Isophya modesta group and remarks on the systematics of the genus based on morphological and acoustic data0 aReview of the Balkan iIsophyai Orthoptera Phaneropteridae with p3 a

A critical review of the taxonomy and systematics of the genus Isophya from the Balkan Peninsula, together with a revision of the I. modesta group, including its representatives outside the Balkans, has been made using morphological, bioacoustic and karyological data. As a result, the following taxonomic considerations have been proposed: (1) the status of two taxa has been reconsidered: Isophya rhodopensis leonorae Kaltenbach, stat.n., I. rhodopensis petkovi Peshev, stat.n.; (2) five synonymies have been established: I. hospodar (Saussure) = I. hospodar medimontana Nedelkov, syn.n.; I. plevnensis Peshev, sensu novo = I. pravdini pravdini Peshev, syn.n.; I. rhodopensis leonorae Kaltenbach = I. kisi Peshev, syn.n.; I. obtusa = I. pravdini bazyluki Peshev, syn.n.; I. modesta Frivaldszky = I. modesta intermedia Kis syn.n. The descriptions of the taxa under consideration are supplemented with unpublished morphological and/or bioacoustic data. An updated list of the taxa occurring on the Balkans includes 24 taxa (21 species, including the doubtful data on I. camptoxypha). A dichotomic and tabulated key for recognition and maps of distribution of the established taxa are presented.

10aAnatolia10aBarbitistini10aBush-crickets10adistribution10aevolution10agrouping10akeys10aSoutheastern Europe1 aChobanov, Dragan, Petrov1 aGrzywacz, Beata1 aIorgu, Ionuț, Ștefan1 aCiplak, Battal1 aILIEVA, MAYA, B.1 aWarchałowska-Śliwa, Elżbieta uhttp://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/issue/view/zootaxa.3658.101890nas a2200217 4500008004100000245010700041210006900148520112500217653001801342653001401360653003101374653001101405653001101416653001201427100001801439700002601457700001801483700002001501700002001521856013101541 2019 eng d00aWhistling shares a common tongue with speech: bioacoustics from real-time MRI of the human vocal tract0 aWhistling shares a common tongue with speech bioacoustics from r3 a

Most human communication is carried by modulations of the voice. However, a wide range of cultures has developed alternative forms of communication that make use of a whistled sound source. For example, whistling is used as a highly salient signal for capturing attention, and can have iconic cultural meanings such as the catcall, enact a formal code as in boatswain's calls or stand as a proxy for speech in whistled languages. We used real-time magnetic resonance imaging to examine the muscular control of whistling to describe a strong association between the shape of the tongue and the whistled frequency. This bioacoustic profile parallels the use of the tongue in vowel production. This is consistent with the role of whistled languages as proxies for spoken languages, in which one of the acoustical features of speech sounds is substituted with a frequency-modulated whistle. Furthermore, previous evidence that non-human apes may be capable of learning to whistle from humans suggests that these animals may have similar sensorimotor abilities to those that are used to support speech in humans.

10acommunication10aevolution10amagnetic resonance imaging10aspeech10atongue10awhistle1 aBelyk, Michel1 aSchultz, Benjamin, G.1 aCorreia, Joao1 aBeal, Deryk, S.1 aKotz, Sonja, A. uhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.1116https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2019.111602368nas a2200205 4500008004100000245011100041210006900152520173000221653001201951653001601963653001501979653001401994653001602008653001502024653001202039100002202051700002602073700001702099856004602116 2019 eng d00aSeparation-related behaviour indicates the effect of functional breed selection in dogs (Canis familiaris)0 aSeparationrelated behaviour indicates the effect of functional b3 a

The domestication of dogs resulted in several fundamental behavioural changes as compared to their closest wild living relative, the wolf. While these characteristics are considered to be fairly robust across dogs, dog breeds themselves manifest apparently strong behavioural differences. Thus far the functional roots of breed-specific behaviours are still less understood and supported by empirical research. We hypothesized that historical selection for the level of working interaction intimacy with their handlers, may have resulted in the fundamental differences between the main working dog types and their behavioural reactions when separated from their owner. In our study, dogs from breeds that were originally selected for either cooperative or independent work tasks, were tested in a short outdoor separation test. We included dogs with and without owner-reported separation-related disorder (SRD) to both groups. We found that SRD-status and the breed type were in significant association with various stress related behaviours during separation from the owner. Dogs from cooperative working breeds with SRD barked more frequently, meanwhile barking was less prevalent in independent breeds and also in cooperative breeds without owner-reported SRD symptoms. General movement (showing the dogs’ intention to follow or find the disappearing, then absent owner) was uniformly strongest in cooperative dogs with SRD. Whining appeared most frequently in dogs with SRD, regardless to the breed type. These are the first results that support a functional evolutionary framework behind the association of particular dog breeds with the extent of their stressful reactions to separation from their owner.

10aBarking10acooperation10aDog breeds10aevolution10aFrustration10aSeparation10aWhining1 aPongrácz, Péter1 aGómez, Sara, Alvarez1 aLenkei, Rita uhttps://bio.acousti.ca/zh-hant/node/5741702271nas a2200241 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001600214300001400230490000800244520155100252653001401803653002401817653001401841653001901855653001401874100002101888700002001909700002301929700002601952856005101978 2000 eng d a0952-836900aA comparative study of ultrasound-triggered behaviour in tiger beetles (Cicindelidae)0 acomparative study of ultrasoundtriggered behaviour in tiger beet cJan-07-2000 a355 - 3680 v2513 a

This study examines the behavioural responses to ultrasound in 52 species from the family Cicindelidae using both tethered Øight and non-Øight assays. Tethered Øying tiger beetles respond to trains of bat-like ultrasonic pulses with a short-latency, multi-component behaviour. There was no variation in the nature of the behavioural responses regardless of geographical distribution or phylogenetic position. Lowest mean behavioural thresholds lie predominantly between 30 and 45 kHz. Sensitivity, however, varies widely, and several species do not respond at all in these assays. The lowest thresholds for responders are most often between 70 and 80 dB SPL. Almost all subgenera of North American tiger beetles in the genus Cicindela have at least some species with low-threshold acoustic behaviour. The single exception is the large subgenus Cicindela where all species are completely unresponsive or have very high thresholds. There was little relationship between habitat and responsiveness to ultrasound, but there is a strong correlation with seasonal activity ± species with adults active in the spring and autumn (all in the subgenus Cicindela )do not show ultrasound-triggered behaviour whereas summer-active species generally do. Superimposing these data on a current phylogeny of the North American tiger beetles suggests that acoustic behaviour (and hearing) is a shared primitive trait among the taxa examined here and that there have been at least Æve independent losses of this character.

10aCicindela10adefensive behaviour10aevolution10ainsect hearing10aphylogeny1 aYager, David, D.1 aCook, Aaron, P.1 aPearson, David, L.1 aSpangler, Hayward, G. uhttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jzo/251/3